Archive for October, 2008

A Humanities Perspective

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

Today we have a guest entry from a friend of mine – Joseph D. Kuzma. With lots of entries on science related issues, I thought it would be useful to have the perspective of a PhD student of humanities

——————————————————

If the spirit of interdisciplinary inclusiveness has found a worthy, and perhaps intractable enemy amidst the increasing fragmentation and micro-specialisation of discourses, it seems that philosophers have never really had a problem with reconciling the two. Specialisation need not preclude interdisciplinary broadness – this is the lesson we are beginning to learn, and it is a lesson, moreover, which the best philosophers have always known — seduced, as they so often were, from neighbouring discourses such as mathematics, natural science, theology, and literature.

This would tend to explain, at least partially, the intimidating breadth which philosophical discourse has today attained. For those of us who conduct philosophical research at the doctoral, or post-doctoral level, there can now be little doubt about the fact that as our subject of research becomes increasingly specialized (consider the ever-proliferating branches of philosophy, from bio-ethics to Badiou’s set-theory, and from epistemology to political philosophy) it also opens itself, at the very same time, to the possibility of an increasingly diverse range of interdisciplinary encounters.

Perhaps more than ever before, it has become perilous to philosophise in an intellectual vacuum. The cliché of the detached, stoic philosophy student, surrounded by dusty tomes lives on, of course, as an academic stereotype not so readily disproved. And yet the philosophies of the future, and there will be as many of these as there will be new species for a botanist to discover, will most likely be the product of minds attuned to the productive resonance (and resonance is often dissonant at first) of divergent new theories no longer bound to any one discourse in particular. And direct engagement in the world itself, as well as openness to alterity in all its forms, will be a pre-requisite.

As my doctoral research at Warwick enters its third year – and the prospect of entering the job market presents itself as an exigency which soon will be undeferrable – all of this becomes a matter not only of philosophical interest but of personal interest as well.

Research Communities

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

With the rise of online communities and networking websites, it has become easier to link with people of similar interests. LinkedIn is particularly popular. I just came across some useful links for research communities which are not limited to a certain university or research area:

The TENCompetence PhD research network aims to provide researchers with a space in which they can meet, discuss with and learn from their peers. It is intended as a Europe-wide community “hotspot” where researchers can share working interests, problems and solutions.

The Graduate Junction is the first website to bring together Masters, Doctoral and Postdoctoral researchers and scholars from any discipline across the globe. The Graduate Junction provides an easy way of making contact and communicating with others who share common research interests.

  • ISI Web of Knowledge is extensive and says, “Over 20 million researchers in 90 countries base their research, planning, and budget decisions on the content and analytics they find in ISI Web of Knowledge.”

Good research in management should help the world to be better managed. As the world’s leading publisher of business and management research, with 190 journals and a wide range of serials, series and books in management and related fields, we believe we have an important role in encouraging research which helps the world be better managed.

PhD Dissertation

Thursday, October 23rd, 2008

Prof. Douglas E. Comer has some excellent advice about dissertation writing. He has also precisely stated the requirements of a dissertation:

A PhD dissertation is a lengthy, formal document that argues in defense of a particular thesis…Two important adjectives used to describe a dissertation are “original” and “substantial.” The research performed to support a thesis must be both, and the dissertation must show it to be so. In particular, a dissertation highlights original contributions… The essence of a dissertation is critical thinking, not experimental data. Analysis and concepts form the heart of the work… In general, every statement in a dissertation must be supported either by a reference to published scientific literature or by original work. (more…)

Technical Presentations

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

A good technical presentation requires a lot more than presentation skills. A broad understanding of the subject and where one’s work stands in relation to other work is important. Michael D. Ernst has some excellent advice on keys to a good technical presentation. Ernst emphasizes that the goal is to convince that the problem is worthwhile, that it’s not an easy problem, and a good solution has been proposed. In order to convince the audience that the research is worthwhile, it is important to give motivational examples.

He also points out a mistake which I am prone to making:

Do not try to do too much in a talk. About one slide per minute is a good pace (possibly more if lots of your slides are animations that take only moments to present). If you try to fit the entire technical content of a paper into a talk, you will rush, with the result that the audience may come away understanding nothing.

This is especially true if one has some lengthy proof to explain and one gets into the details of the proof. It is better to spell out the result and give some insight into how the proof works rather than explaining each step of the proof. Ernst summarizes this approach well by saying that:

It’s better to think of the talk as an advertisement for the paper that gives the key ideas, intuitions, and results, and that makes the audience eager to read your paper or to talk with you to learn more. That does not mean holding back important details – merely omitting less important ones.

Birthday Workshop

Friday, October 17th, 2008

In academic circles, there is a nice tradition of arranging a conference on the birthdays of senior professors. It is a coming together of researchers in the area. On his 66th birthday, a workshop on theoretical computer science was arranged to honour Prof. Mike Paterson, who is my supervisor. This turned out to be an exceptional event where two Turing award (equivalent to a Nobel Prize for computer science) winners gave talks. The official description of the event was as follows:

Mike has been a leading figure in the research of theoretical computer science for nearly 40 years, and this workshop will celebrate Mike’s contribution through a number of invited talks that will cover several of Mike’s research areas as well as some exciting new results.

The workshop lasted for two days and it was a succession of talks by collaborators, colleagues and students of Mike. The talks consisted of two parts: anecdotes about Mike and then technical discussion about work done jointly with Mike or inspired by Mike. The host of the workshop was DIMAP, which is a leading interdisciplinary centre, with participation from the computer science department, mathematics institute and the business school.

In academic life, taking part in these events is essential to developing and maintaining a research community. This point was highlighted by Maurice Nivat, one of the founders of theoretical computer science. Such events are also an excellent forum for an exchange of ideas. Mike was, of course, at his most gracious and witty during the conference. It was also interesting to meet some well-known theoretical computer scientists.