Archive for December, 2009

Research experience before PhD

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

When students apply for a PhD program, their background and preparation for the PhD is considered mainly via the range of course work and performance in those courses. Letters of recommendation are also vital. However one thing which may make the biggest difference is demonstrating actual research experience. This can be

  • an impressive senior year project with some original research
  • a suitable project or survey in an advanced and directly relevant course
  • a summer working as an intern in an established research lab
  • research assistantship with an established researcher in the field
  • a research paper (even if it is in some student publication)
  • assisting in some large collaborative research project

The idea is that admission committees prefer candidates who have some idea about the well-motivated problems in the research area and have the maturity to formulate a research problem and come up with the ideas to solve the problem. These abilities are demonstrated more easily by actual research than course work. For example, any relevant preliminary research already indicates the research interests, writing skills and technical skills of a candidate. Such research is also a useful exercise for the applicant to get a feel of what kind of research they are interested in.

Familiarity with a research area can also be demonstrated by attending workshops and tutorials designed for pre-doctoral or doctoral students and going to relevant seminars. Similarly, one learns many useful things if one has already some research experience during the undergraduate years. One specially learns a lot by collaborating with more senior researchers. This makes the transition into a PhD program easier.

Academics do not just teach

Friday, December 11th, 2009

When some people outside academia ask about the role of a postdoctoral researcher, they expect that it is mainly a teaching job. It is surprising for them to find that many academic positions do not require any teaching. So what do these researchers who are not teaching actually doing? The answer is that research is a multidimensional activity which involves many responsibilities and skills:

  1. Researchers spend a lot of time reading. This includes reading latest research papers, classic works, surveys, theses etc.
  2. One also spends time thinking: formulating problems, analyzing previously known methods, considering alternative solutions, defining concepts, discussing problems, proving theorems etc. One may be more productive if one is thinking more than simply reading. However both activities complement each other.
  3. Presenting takes up some time. Presentations are made at conferences, meetings and workshops. Professional researchers pride themselves in being able to present their own work in a clear way. Presentations could also be informal such as explaining your work to a colleague.
  4. Grants are another important issue which researchers need to take care of. This includes writing applications to scientific organizations and funding institutes for research grants, academic fellowships, and travel scholarships etc.
  5. Another activity is serving the scientific community. This includes reviewing papers and rating research proposals, serving on organizing committees, working in program committees, editing  journals and books.
  6. Supervising  and managing is another important responsibility. The senior the position of an academic, the more significant is one’s supervising abilities. This can range from supervising a graduate student to take care of a huge institute.

Some comments on vivas

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Vivas can vary with the nature of research, attitude of the examiner and the flow of the conversation. However, there are some standard questions which one can easily expect:

  • Can you please give an outline of your thesis and why you got interested in this research area?
  • What is the context of your research?
  • How would you assess your own research?
  • Which are the strongest results in your thesis?
  • Which results of the thesis do you particularly like?
  • How would you judge the technical depth of the various parts of the thesis?
  • How would you judge the contributions of your coauthors in the different chapters of your thesis?
  • Can you tell which parts of the thesis will interest which research communities more?
  • Where do you see the research heading in the future?
  • What are the natural extensions of the research conducted?
  • Why is this term introduced here and not there? (justify the logical flow of your thesis)

Apart from standard questions, a few other things can make the viva a smoother experience:

  • Prepare a general description of the thesis. This will most likely be your first answer and a good start can calm the nerves.
  • Refresh the names of authors you have cited in the thesis. It can create a good impression if you can use the names when you are referring their paper during a conversation.
  • Highlight important parts of the thesis to make it more readable and accessible especially during the viva.
  • Try to think up questions which you might expect.