Promoting speaking fluency

Becoming a more fluent speaker of English is an important goal for the majority of English language learners. In this article, the concept of ‘speaking fluency’ is briefly defined, and four methods shown to promote speaking fluency are discussed. The teacher’s role in enabling their students to develop speaking fluency is examined, and some suggestions are made as to what the teacher should do to facilitate the process.

What is fluency?

Fluency is the area of language ability which relates to the speed and ease with which a language learner performs in one of the four core language skills of speaking, listening, reading and writing. Although the concept of fluency relates to all four language skills, it tends to be most closely associated with speaking.

What is speaking fluency?

Speaking fluency is ‘the ability to link units of speech together with facility and without strain or inappropriate slowness or undue hesitation’. (Hedge 2000) The speech of non-fluent English learners tends to be characterized by ‘frequent pauses, repetitions and self-corrections’ (Hedge 1993) Developing speaking fluency, therefore, entails developing the ability to speak without frequent pauses, repetitions and self-corrections.

How can language learners improve their speaking fluency?

1. Not worrying about making mistakes

Fluency is usually contrasted with accuracy, where the latter entails knowledge of ‘pronunciation, vocabulary, word formation, grammatical structure, sentence structure and linguistic semantics’ (Hedge 2000). Fluency and accuracy are often envisaged as lying on the two opposing plates of a weighing scale: as one side goes up, the other goes down.

Some learners of English are able to significantly increase their fluency by temporarily disregarding accuracy. As they pay less attention to the grammatical conformity of their utterances, and more attention to conveying meaning, the speed of their speech can increase, and hesitations and pauses can decrease. We should therefore encourage our students not to worry about making mistakes in situations where fluent speech is more important than perfectly grammatically accurate speech, such as informal conversations inside and outside of the classroom. As teachers, we should exhibit restraint in correcting students during language activities designed to promote fluency.

2. Learning ‘pre-assembled chunks’ of language

Fluency also improves when language knowledge has become ‘automized’ (Thornbury 1999), i.e. when the learner is able to produce language without consciously thinking about it. One way students can aid the process of spoken language ability becoming automatic is to learn ‘pre-assembled chunks’ of language.

‘Chunks’ of language are idiomatic phrases such as ‘as it were’ and ‘on the other hand’ which tend to be produced as a whole rather than assembled grammatically piece by piece (Nattinger and DeCarrico 1992). Because such phrases are stored in a ‘pre-assembled’ form in the brain, they can be recalled relatively quickly and effortlessly, thus helping to eliminate pauses and hesitations and increase the overall speed of speech.

Chunks of language can also help learners to compensate for lack of linguistic knowledge. If a student lacks the vocabulary to describe something, phrases such as ‘it’s kind of like…’ can be of some avail. If they lose their way in making an argument, gambits such as ‘the point I’m trying to make is…’ can be of assistance. We should therefore provide opportunities to our students to learn and practice idiomatic, pre-assembled chunks of language.

3. Planning ahead

If a student knows that they are going to be talking about a certain topic in their next English lesson, or discussing a particular issue with their company’s counterpart in America in their next teleconference, then planning for that topic or discussion is an indispensable way for them to increase their oral fluency when speaking in that situation (Kellem 2009).

Planning involves making written notes, composing written answers to expected questions, and rehearsal. If the student is giving a speech or presentation in English, then it goes without saying that they need to practice the speech multiple times. This is something that we would do even if we were giving a speech in our native language, and it is even more important to do when preparing to give a speech in a second or foreign language. We should therefore provide opportunities to our students for the planning and rehearsal of speeches and discussions before they take place.

4. Studying abroad

Research suggests that fluency can be significantly increased by studying abroad. In Wood (2007), Japanese students who spent time studying on a full time intensive ESL course at a college in Canada were able to increase their rate of speech, and length of time speaking between pauses, as well as making gains in other areas of fluency. The financial cost of studying abroad may well be worth it, then, in terms of the increase in speaking fluency the learner can expect to obtain. We should encourage our students to take such opportunities if and when they are able to do so, to improve their language skills in general, and speaking fluency in particular.

Conclusion

Acquiring improved speaking fluency is a very common and highly ranked goal among learners of English. I have argued that, as English teachers, we should:

  • encourage our students not to worry about making mistakes in activities designed to promote fluency and informal conversations;
  • provide opportunities for our students to learn and practice pre-assembled chunks of language;
  • provide opportunities for our students to practice and rehearse speeches and discussions before they take place;
  • encourage our students to spend time studying abroad where they possess the means to do so.

In these ways, we can help our students to improve their speaking fluency, and take important steps toward becoming more communicatively competent speakers of English.

Bibliography

  • Hedge, T. (1993). “Key concepts in ELT.” ELT Journal 47(3):275-277.
  • Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Kellem, H. (2009). “Principles for developing oral fluency in the classroom.” JALT Journal 33(1): 9-11.
  • Nattinger, J. R. and J. S. DeCarrico (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. Harlow, Pearson Education.
  • Wood, D. (2007). “Mastering the English formula: Fluency development of Japanese learners in a study abroad context.” JALT Journal 29(2): 209-230.
FacebookEmailPrintShare

About Paul Raine

Paul has taught English as a foreign language in Japan since 2006, and obtained a masters degree in Teaching English as a Foreign and Second Language in 2012. He has a wide range of experience in a variety of different teaching contexts, including conversation schools, junior and senior high schools, blue-chip companies, and colleges and universities. He is particularly interested in integrating technology with English language pedagogy.

11 Responses to Promoting speaking fluency

  1. Jenny Nguyen says:

    Hi Paul, have you very done an empirical study on the effect of lexical chunks on speaking fluency? I wonder if it have a positive effect on promoting English speaking fluency?

    • Paul Raine says:

      Hi Jenny, thanks for your comment. I personally haven’t conducted any research in this area, but the research I’ve read certainly seems to suggest that the use of lexical chunks is beneficial and effective for increasing fluency. Do you know any other techniques for increasing fluency?

      • Jenny says:

        Hi Paul, Can you recommend me some references related to the use of lexical chunks and its effect o fluency. I think that conversational practice also promotes speaking fluency. Do you think so?

      • Jenny Nguyen says:

        Hi Paul, can you recommend me some reading materials related to the topics?. Thanks. I think that conversational practice can also promote speaking fluency.

        • Paul Raine says:

          Hi Jenny – thanks for your comment, and apologies for my late reply. The bibliography at the end of the article contains some useful further reading materials :-) I think you’re right, conversation practice is very important for increasing speaking fluency.

  2. Hurry says:

    Hi Paul,

    I just arrived at your website by chance. I’m now working on my paper and I was searching for native English teacher related articles and the search led me here.

    Points 2 and 3 are very impressive. Vocabulary has always been the topic of my research and I wrote a lot as well about the importance of pre-discussion or pre-conversation preparation this semester. I just have a slightly different view on Point 1.

    To me everything is two-sided, including speaking fluency. I am a non-native speaker, so I’ve been paying particular attention to this. One weird thing I’ve discovered is the fact that, for a lot of non-native speakers, their pronunciation and grammar are as bad as bad can be, but they speak English really fast. In other words, they speak bad English really fluently. How come?

    Some people are not able to speak fluent English because, as you mentioned, the concern about making mistakes hinders the development of their spoken language, while some, on the contrary, are not taking pronunciation and grammar seriously, believing that fluency is the biggest deal and the only thing to measure proficiency and flaunt themselves with.

    “Fluency is usually contrasted with accuracy, … Fluency and accuracy are often envisaged as lying on the two opposing plates of a weighing scale: as one side goes up, the other goes down.” Well, for me, I’d rather not place these two elements on the two extreme ends of this continuum as an either-or situation. I think we do need to keep an eye on accurary, but not as much as it impedes the way we talk. There should be a balance between fluency and accuracy, which I see as a middle ground. To a certain group of non-native speakers, appropriate pauses, repetitions and self-corrections are necessary before they can go through this stage in their second language learning.

    Speaking fluency is ‘the ability to link units of speech together with facility and without strain or inappropriate slowness or undue hesitation’. (Hedge 2000) I totally agree with Hedge’s definition of speaking flluency more than 10 years ago, with only an addition to it: “the ability to link units of speech together with facility and accuracy and without strain or inappropriate slowness or undue hesitation” (or does facility already include accuracy in it?) I think accuracy should be part of the definition of speaking fluency so as not to mislead non-native speakers into a false sense of fluency. The thing is, if they intentionally or subconsciously speak the language fast with a bunch of pronunciation and grammatical errors in it, over time, their second language gets fossilized and when that happens, it will be really difficult for an improvement to follow.

    To sum, I think it might be advisable to give equal emphsis to fluency and accuracy to pull those one-sided non-native learners back on the right track.

    The above is my two cents. I hope it doesn’t sound subjective, which is the last thing I want to do when I’m alive.

    • Paul Raine says:

      Hi Hurry, many thanks for your comprehensive feedback, and apologies for my late reply. You make some very interesting points in your comment. The separation of “accuracy” and “fluency” is somewhat of a controversial issue in foreign language learning research.

      The “weighing scale” metaphor of fluency vs. accuracy rests on the definition that states that fluency is the unhesitating, rapid production of speech.

      However, as you point out, this is not the definition of fluency many learners (and teachers) of English have in mind. The definition they have in mind is that fluency is the unhesitating, rapid production of error-free speech. This definition of fluency smashes the weighing scales metaphor as fluency and accuracy are conflated into a single notion.

      As you point out, fossilization is a concern for those language learners who never notice, or are never informed of, their own mistakes.

      I agree with you that a good balance between accuracy and fluency is necessary. However, obtaining the balance is a difficult and ongoing challenge for most foreign language learners.

  3. Hurry says:

    Thank you for your reply to share your opinions. You are doing a great website! It’s very useful to ESL learners. I’ll keep an eye on your website.

    • Paul Raine says:

      Hurry, thanks very much for your kind comment! I’m glad the information in this blog is useful to you. I look forward to reading further comments from you in the future.

  4. bita says:

    Thanks Paul your website helped me

    • Paul Raine says:

      Thank you for your comment, Bita. I’m glad you found the website useful. It means a lot to me to get positive feedback. Thanks again!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>